-----> .. .... 13} 1956 pierre plantard was a figurehead in organization XXXX.> indeed, probably all 'nautonniers' were.. ....and will be...... ....> figureheads. when did messers newton and daVinci have the TIME to> devote to concerns outside their chosen realms of expertise ?? the TRUE> movers and shakers within XXXX shunned titles. they let the> vainglorious chaps like plantard be the frontmen while the TRUE labor> was carried on by silent eminences gris> > .. ...1] the organization we have usually called 'the priory of sion'> does exist. for simplicity's sake, i'll designate it as XXXX.> > I use the term XXXX because i contend that the camorra changes> names as dictated by the exigencies of the time period. for all we> know, XXXX might, in 2006, be using the designation 'union of usufruct> users of utrecht' or 'omeraburgau order of ortolan owners'> > this propensity for changing monikers very well might explain why no> records of XXXX exists in france prior to 1956> > . .... 2] the clique currently led by gino sandri is a side show> engineered by XXXX. beginning in 1982, the planet got used to thinking> in terms of there being a gang called 'the priory of sion.' that name> has been abandoned for an appellation that we will probably never know.> so the wee little Sandri-led 'priory' is just a straw man established> to draw attention away from XXXX> > ... .. 3/ xxx endures.......and has always endured.....as an 'umbrella> organization'.......a confederation or consortium of a number of groups> : i.e., such crews as neo-templars, rosicrucians, dragon order members,> knights of malta, upper-upper eschelon of the vatican, upper-eschelon> of the freemasons, etc.> > .... ...... 4/i've always seen the goals of XXXX as political in> nature. many readers finished hbhg believing their main thrust was> spiritual. of course, their aims intertwine these two strands. yet, i> keep coming back to the political factor.> > with a number of european nations experiencing social-political unrest,> it would seem logical that they might look to the sort of patriarchal> 'order' which could be provided by crowned heads back in power - - - -> perhaps particulary the case in eastern european nations> > i've always rather assumed that, under this heading, we'd be speaking> of constitutional monarchies ; nonetheless, an ami or two or three has> suggested that XXXX is not interested in constitutional monarchies but> instead harkens back to the 'good old days' of absolute sovereigns> > .. .. 6//to me, hbhg IMPLIED the existence of a european 'uber-king'> who would be the master of 'sub-kings' within european nations - - - -> shades of the anti-christ ????? quite possibly, i'm attaching too much> importance to the 'uber-king' paradigm. maybe XXXX will be quite> pleased 'just' to have monarchs seated on various european thrones> > . ... .... 7//the purported 'davidic bloodline' or 'jesus bloodline'> does not exist. yet the XXXX wishes the planet to believe it exists. we> all recognize that falsehoods CAN indeed shape reality.> > i keep using the same ole example : somehow serbians get the idea that> brunettes look horrible in blue. a completely untrue premise. still, as> a result of this BELIEF, all serbian manufacturers of blue dresses go> bankrupt. a hard fact created by a silly piece of fiction> > ergo, it is in SOMEBODY's best interest to have mortals believe that a> 'sacred bloodline' DOES indeed exist. The 'somebody' is XXXX. why do> they wish humankind to share this belief ?? the closest I can get is> that XXXX somehow thinks that this concept - - if widely-held - - will> make it easy to manipulate the hoi polloi> > the scenario is meant to go something like this : european> nations....or a number of european nations .....become so distressed by> social//political unrest, that the 'masses' are ready to jump at the> chance of being governed by 'supernatural' 'saviors'> > for donkey's years, i rather assumed europeans - - as materialists and> empiricists and humanists - - - would NEVER be interested in spiritual> topics. yet, IF conditions get horrible enough, even a sophisticated> citizen of milan or lyons or hamburg could POTENTIALLY get to the level> where he's ready to be manipulated by XXXX.> > .. .. .. 8//sites such as rosslyn chapel and rennes-le-chateau are> sideshows to the main themes and interests of XXXX. yes, both spots> contain intriguing insights into the ways and means of the organization> - - - but that's all> > why did XXXX take the time and trouble to set-up these diversions ?? of> course, i have no idea. still, we all realize the XXXX does have a> 'merry prankster' side. the 'creation' of rlc and rosslyn chapel suits> this puckish personality - - dangling clues re the organization right> under the public's nose. yet the clues are minor ones - - and probably> some of the clues are meant to mis-lead rather than to inform> > .... .... 9//if one tunnels underneath pech cardou and rosslyn chapel,> one would find a few worms and lots of dirt. yet - - in the mode of> 'bread and circuses'-- it suits the book of XXXX to encourage> speculation about what lies under these sites. if the proletariat waste> their hours with these divertissements, they will have neither time nor> energy to better their lots. if the descamisidos do nothing about> improving their lives, they become fodder for the machinations of XXXX.> > . .. .... 10//as i've expressed in the past, my view dictates that a> few --- VERY few --- leaders within the vatican are non-trinitarian in> outlook - - and have built their denomination along those lines.> > perhaps we could think of them as belonging to the ancient 'arian> heresy.' indeed, at the time when the merovingians first came to the> fore, some of their fellow rulers chose to become 'christians' of the> arian stamp. i should think most of us would label adherents of the> arian heresy as non-trinitarians. there is no new thing under the sun> > ....... ... 11// as the 21st century rolls along, look for increased> activity within the ecumenical movement. many of the sovereigns> re-established by XXXX will be members of the Latin church. some will> be eastern orthodox. the current rulers of scandanavian nations are> lutherans, with future king charles III of uk an> anglican//espisopalian.> > it will suit the purposes of XXXX to have them all belong to a> quasi-christian denomination, a non-trinitarian denomination. i foresee> all mainstream protestant groups {methodists, presbyterians,> episcopalians, lutherans} moving, inch by inch, towards an 'arian> christian' stance> > my divination also includes the joining together of this 'arian'> protestant bunch with an 'arian' roman catholic> group...............with somehow the eastern orthodox ecumenically> wedged-in> > .. .. .. 12// although, as previously stated, i have no use for> 'bloodline' theories, the royals seeking to gain power or re-gain> power, DO in actuality form a quasi-super-dynasty - - - - in that,> thanks to over a thousand years of inter-marriage, they form a 'race'> unto themselves-
----
No comments:
Post a Comment